KAPLAN v. SAINT PETER'S HEALTHCARE SYSTEM et al
| LAURENCE KAPLAN |
| SAINT PETER'S HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, RONALD C. RAK, SUSAN BALLESTERO, GARRICK STOLDT and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-20 |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 3:2013cv02941 |
| May 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Trenton Office |
| Middlesex |
| Tonianne J. Bongiovanni |
| Michael A. Shipp |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
280
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 2/24/2023. (jdb)
|
|
Filing
277
MEMORANDUM OPINION Filed. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 2/17/2023. (jal, )
|
|
Filing
214
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 4/30/2019. (gxh)
|
|
Filing
116
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 12/12/2014. (jjc)
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 9/19/2014. (kas, )
|
|
Filing
91
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Defendants' Request to stay briefing on Plaintiffs two pending motions (ECF Nos. 83, 89) is DENIED; Plaintiffs request to order Defendants' participation in a Rule 26(f) conference or for expedited discovery is DENIED. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 5/14/2014. (kas, )
|
|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 03/31/2014. (FH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
