FIELDS v. PLOUSIS et al
| MARK FIELDS |
| JAMES T. PLOUSIS, NORMAN ROBERTSON, JOHN DOE and JAMES MACGOWAN |
| 3:2014cv01139 |
| February 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Trenton Office |
| Mercer |
| Lois H. Goodman |
| Joel A. Pisano |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Anne E. Thompson on 12/18/2015. (eaj)
|
|
Filing
2
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby DENIED without prejudice; that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively terminate this case; that the Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a blank form application to proceed informa pauperis; that if Plaintiff wishes to reopen this case, he shall so notify the Court, in writing within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order; that upon receipt of a writing from Plaintiff stating that he wishes to reopen this case, and either a complete in forma pauperis application or payment of the filing and administrative fees within the time allotted by this Court, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to reopen this case; that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Joel A. Pisano on 3/3/2014. (jjc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
