INNOVATIVE ADVOCATES GROUP, INC. v. URISH POPECK & CO., LLC et al

Defendant: URISH POPECK & CO., LLC and SIMILE, INC.
Plaintiff: INNOVATIVE ADVOCATES GROUP, INC.
Case Number: 3:2014cv04418
Filed: July 14, 2014
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Trenton Office
County: Monmouth
Referring Judge: Lois H. Goodman
Presiding Judge: Peter G. Sheridan
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage
Cause of Action: 28:1446
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: INNOVATIVE ADVOCATES GROUP, INC. v. URISH POPECK & CO., LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: URISH POPECK & CO., LLC
Represented By: PHILIP ALAN MAGEN
Represented By: GARY A. DEVITO(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SIMILE, INC.
Represented By: GARY A. DEVITO(Designation Retained)
Represented By: PHILIP ALAN MAGEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: INNOVATIVE ADVOCATES GROUP, INC.
Represented By: CHRISTOPHER J. DALTON(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.