NAYEE v. D'ILIO et al
| ANIL NAYEE |
| STEPHEN M. D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY |
| 3:2015cv01288 |
| February 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Trenton Office |
| Mercer |
| Peter G. Sheridan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM & ORDER that the Clerk shall reopen this case for the purpose of deciding Petitioner's two outstanding motions; Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied as unnecessary; Petitioner's motion fo r leave to file a brief in support of his motion to expand the certificate of appealability 46 is GRANTED; Petitioner's motion to expand the certificate of appealability 45 is DENIED; the Clerk shall re-close this case. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 9/08/2021. (jem)
|
|
Filing
41
OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 4/23/2021. (jem)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 3 Petitioner's Motion to Stay; Ordering that within 30 days of the date of this Order, Petitioner must file his PCR petition in state court; further Ordering that Petitioner shall file a request to reopen this action within 30 days after exhaustion of his state law claims; Administratively terminating this action. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 9/9/2015. (eaj) Modified on 9/9/2015 (eaj, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
