MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. v. ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC. et al
Plaintiff: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Defendant: ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC., ANDRX CORPORATION, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. and ACTAVIS, INC.
Case Number: 3:2015cv06075
Filed: August 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Trenton Office
County: Union
Presiding Judge: Douglas E. Arpert
Presiding Judge: Peter G. Sheridan
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 223 MEMORANDUM and ORDER that claim 11 of the 5,661,151 patent is not invalid under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 102(a); that claim 12 of the 151 patent is not invalid under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 9/28/2017. (km)
June 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 164 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: Joint Claim Construction regarding U.S. Patent No. 5,661,151. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 6/27/2017. (mmh)
March 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 124 MEMORANDUM ORDER that Defendants' 114 motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 3/24/2017. (km)
March 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 118 MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying without prejudice 89 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 3/6/2017. (mmh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. v. ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Represented By: CHARLES H. CHEVALIER
Represented By: DAVID E. DELORENZI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC.
Represented By: SELINA MIRIAM ELLIS
Represented By: TRICIA B. O'REILLY
Represented By: LIZA M. WALSH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDRX CORPORATION
Represented By: SELINA MIRIAM ELLIS
Represented By: TRICIA B. O'REILLY
Represented By: LIZA M. WALSH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC.
Represented By: SELINA MIRIAM ELLIS
Represented By: TRICIA B. O'REILLY
Represented By: LIZA M. WALSH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ACTAVIS, INC.
Represented By: SELINA MIRIAM ELLIS
Represented By: TRICIA B. O'REILLY
Represented By: LIZA M. WALSH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?