PADRO v. SHAKIR et al
Plaintiff: FRANK PADRO
Defendant: AHMAR SHAKIR, SCOTT MILLER, ANNE PEREGMON and ALEJANDRINA SUMICAD
Case Number: 3:2015cv07096
Filed: September 25, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Trenton Office
County: Mercer
Presiding Judge: Douglas E. Arpert
Presiding Judge: Michael A. Shipp
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 152 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting Defendant' 140 and 142 Motions for Summary Judgment. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Miller and Shakir as to Plaintiff's remaining intentional infliction of emotional distress claims. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 1/24/2022. (jmh)
August 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 138 OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 8/19/2021. (jmh)
January 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 78 MEMORANDUM OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 1/28/2019. (mmh)
June 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 66 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 59 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Dr. Scott Miller. The medical malpractice claims against Dr. Miller are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 6/18/2018. (mmh)
May 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 65 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 54 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Dr. Ahmar Shakir. The medical malpractice claim against Dr. Shakir is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 5/9/2018. (mmh)
March 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 Memorandum and Order that Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of pro bono counsel (d.e. 7 ) is GRANTED; that the Clerk shall appoint pro bono counsel to represent Plaintiff in this matter; that Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file an affidavit of merit (d.e. 23 ) is denied as moot and without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 3/3/2016. (mmh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PADRO v. SHAKIR et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FRANK PADRO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AHMAR SHAKIR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SCOTT MILLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANNE PEREGMON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALEJANDRINA SUMICAD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?