GAMBLE v. JOHNSON et al
CHARLES GAMBLE |
STEPHEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY |
3:2015cv08358 |
November 30, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Trenton Office |
Ocean |
Michael A. Shipp |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 4/4/2024. (jal, ) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 1/29/2019. (mps) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM ORDER that Respondents' 9 Motion to Dismiss is denied. Respondents' shall file a full and complete answer to all claims asserted in the Petition within forty-five (45) days of the entry of this Order. The Clerk shall serve this Order on Petitioner by regular mail. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 8/9/2018. (mps) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM & ORDER Administratively terminating this case; Ordering that if Petitioner wishes to reopen this case, he shall notify the Court in writing within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order; Petitioner's writing shall include a comp lete, signed habeas petition on the appropriate form, and either: (1) a complete in forma pauperis application, including a signed affidavit of indigence with a certification of Petitioner's institutional account, as required by Local Civil Rule 8 l.2(b ), or (2) the $5 filing fee. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 12/4/2015. (eaj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.