OAKWOOD LABORATORIES, LLC v. THANOO et al
| OAKWOOD LABORATORIES, LLC |
| BAGAVATHIKANUN THANOO, AUROMEDICS PHARMA LLC, AUROBINDO PHARMA U.S.A., INC. and AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD. |
| 3:2017cv05090 |
| July 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Trenton Office |
| Somerset |
| Lois H. Goodman |
| Peter G. Sheridan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 71 is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint 70 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 10/23/2019. (jem)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 58 Motion to Dismiss ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 1/31/2019. (jem)
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Defendant's 37 Motion to Dismiss is granted. Plaintiff's motion to strike Michael Sitzman's declaration (ECF No. 41 ) is granted. Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint within 30 days. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 6/12/2018. (mps)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Defendant's 22 Motion to Dismiss is granted. This matter is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint within 30 days. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 11/28/2017. (mps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
