THE BONDHOLDER COMMITTEE ON BEHALF OF THE OWNERS OF QUAD CITIES REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FIRST MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2013A v. SAUK VALLEY STUDENT HOUSING, LLC et al
THE BONDHOLDER COMMITTEE ON BEHALF OF THE OWNERS OF QUAD CITIES REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FIRST MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2013A |
SAUK VALLEY STUDENT HOUSING, LLC, SUGAR VALLEY CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, ERIC D FLOYD, BMOC, INC., WILLIAM J LEVY, UNITED HOUSING AND COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATION, STEVE SAFFIAN, JILL RYTIE LUTZ, BOKF, NA, JOHN DOES 1-10, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 and XYZ PARTNERSHIPS 1-10 |
3:2017cv07337 |
September 21, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Trenton Office |
Monmouth |
Lois H. Goodman |
Michael A. Shipp |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
12 U.S.C. ยง 22 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 96 MEMORANDUM ORDER directing Plaintiff to properly serve Sugar Valley, Eric Floyd, United Housing and Sauk Valley by 12/23/2021, and dismissing Steve Saffian and Jill Rytie Lutz without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 11/19/2021. (jmh) |
Filing 92 MEMORANDUM OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 10/09/2020. (jem) |
Filing 78 MEMORANDUM OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 1/29/2020. (jem) |
Filing 56 MEMORANDUM OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 4/24/2019. (mps) |
Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 7/11/2018. (mps) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.