FRAENKEL v. GARCIA et al
ALEX FRAENKEL |
WILLIAM GARCIA, MATTHEW ERNY, ROBERT PAVELCHAK, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NJ, STATE OF NJ, CHRISTOPHER BATEMAN, BRIAN GLICOS, STATE POLICE OF NJ and JOHN DOES (1-5) |
3:2018cv09281 |
May 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Trenton Office |
Somerset |
Tonianne J. Bongiovanni |
Michael A. Shipp |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OPINION filed. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 6/26/2019. (km) |
Filing 28 LETTER OPINION AND ORDER that Plaintiff's 24 Fourth Amended Complaint shall serve as to operative Complaint in this matter. The individual Defendants' 23 Motion to Dismiss is terminated. By 11/16/2018, Individual Defendants and State De fendants shall file a joint proposed schedule to answer or respond to Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint. The Clerk of the Court shall issue the Summons requested by Plaintiff (ECF No. 25 ). Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 11/9/2018. (mps) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 11 Motion to Amend Complaint; Plaintiff to file Second Amended Complaint by 10/24/2018, State and Individual Defendants to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint by 11/7/2018; State Defendants and Individual Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are terminated. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 9/24/2018. (km) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.