CELGENE CORPORATION v. SANDOZ INC.
| CELGENE CORPORATION |
| SANDOZ INC. |
| 3:2018cv11026 |
| June 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Trenton Office |
| Mercer |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Michael A Shipp |
| Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
STIPULATION AND ORDER that the date for Sandoz to respond to the Amended Complaint is extended to 9/25/2018; that within 7 days of the filing of Sandoz's Answr in this matter confirming that Sandoz will not contest personal jurisdiction or venue in the District of New Jersey for this action only, Plaintiff will dismiss without prejudice Celgene Corp. v. Sandoz Inc., No. 1:18-CV-1764 (D. Colorado), which involves the same asserted patents and the same accused ANDA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 8/20/2018. (mmh)
|
| Filing 15 Letter from Defendant enclosing proposed stipulation extending time to respond to the Amended Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SAVERIANO, CHRISTINA) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement against SANDOZ INC., filed by CELGENE CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(LIZZA, CHARLES) |
|
Filing 13
STIPULATION AND ORDER that the time for Sandoz to respond to the Complaint is extended until 9/4/2018; that Sandoz will not contest personal jurisdiction or venue in the District of New Jersey for this action only; that within 7 days of the filing of Sandoz's Answer in this matter confirming that Sandoz will not contest personal jurisdiction or venue in the District of New Jersey for this action only, Plaintiff will dismiss without prejudice Celgene Corp. v. Sandoz Inc., No. 1:18-CV-1764 (D. Colorado), which involves the same asserted patents and the same accused ANDA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 7/25/2018. (mmh)
|
| Filing 12 Letter from Sandoz to the Court enclosing proposed Stipulation Extending Time to Answer. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SAVERIANO, CHRISTINA) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by CHRISTINA LYNN SAVERIANO on behalf of SANDOZ INC. (SAVERIANO, CHRISTINA) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by ERIC I. ABRAHAM on behalf of SANDOZ INC. (ABRAHAM, ERIC) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CELGENE CORPORATION. SANDOZ INC. served on 6/27/2018, answer due 7/18/2018. (LIZZA, CHARLES) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by DAVID LEIGH MOSES on behalf of CELGENE CORPORATION (MOSES, DAVID) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by SARAH ANN SULLIVAN on behalf of CELGENE CORPORATION (SULLIVAN, SARAH) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by WILLIAM C. BATON on behalf of CELGENE CORPORATION (BATON, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to SANDOZ INC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiff's attorney information and serve. Issued By *John Moller* (jem) |
| Filing 4 AO120 Patent Form filed. (jem) |
| Filing 3 AO120 Patent Form filed. (jem) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CELGENE CORPORATION. (LIZZA, CHARLES) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SANDOZ INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-8839142), filed by CELGENE CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LIZZA, CHARLES) |
| Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (jem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
