DOE v. BURKE et al
JANE DOE |
Richard Burke, The Warren County Prosecutor's Office, GURBIR GREWAL, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JOHN DOES 1-25, THE COUNTY OF WARREN and CHRISTOPHER PORRINO |
3:2018cv13041 |
August 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Tonianne J Bongiovanni |
Michael A Shipp |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to File Responsive Pleadings by THE COUNTY OF WARREN. (LEVY, ROBERT) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JANE DOE. GURBIR GREWAL served on 9/14/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. (LYTLE, ROBERT) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JANE DOE. CHRISTOPHER PORRINO served on 9/14/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. (LYTLE, ROBERT) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JANE DOE. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY served on 9/14/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. (LYTLE, ROBERT) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JANE DOE. THE COUNTY OF WARREN served on 9/17/2018, answer due 10/8/2018. (LYTLE, ROBERT) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JANE DOE. THE WARREN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE served on 9/17/2018, answer due 10/8/2018. (LYTLE, ROBERT) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by JANE DOE. RICHARD BURKE served on 9/17/2018, answer due 10/8/2018. (LYTLE, ROBERT) |
Clerk`s Text Order - The document #5 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by THE COUNTY OF WARREN has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 10/23/2018. (km) |
Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendant, The County of Warren. Attorney ROBERT E. LEVY for THE COUNTY OF WARREN added. (LEVY, ROBERT) |
![]() |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT JANE DOE (A FICTITOUS NAME) against RICHARD BURKE, GURBIR GREWAL, JOHN DOES 1-25, CHRISTOPHER PORRINO, THE COUNTY OF WARREN, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE WARREN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, filed by JANE DOE. (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons)(LYTLE, ROBERT) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to RICHARD BURKE, GURBIR GREWAL, CHRISTOPHER PORRINO, THE COUNTY OF WARREN, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE WARREN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jem) |
Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni added. (jem) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RICHARD BURKE, GURBIR GREWAL, CHRISTOPHER PORRINO, THE COUNTY OF WARREN, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE WARREN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, JOHN DOES 1-25 ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-8969507) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JANE DOE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Burke - Summons, #3 Summons Warren County - Summons, #4 Summons Warren Cty. Pros. Off. - Summons, #5 Summons Porrino - Summons, #6 Summons Grewal - Summons, #7 Summons State of NJ - Summons)(LYTLE, ROBERT) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: In the future when choosing parties please choose each party individually. Do NOT select the ALL PLAINTIFFS or ALL DEFENDANTS button. Party Information is to be entered in CAPITAL LETTERS . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.