NABUCCO LLC et al v. FROST
BARRY FROST and M&P Retirement Plan |
NABUCCO LLC |
3:2018cv14281 |
September 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Anne E Thompson |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 APPEARANCE in lieu of ANSWER to Complaint by M&P Retirement Plan.(GREENBERG, ADAM) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Notice of Appearance d.e. #3 filed by Adam Greenberg on 10/2/2018 was submitted incorrectly as an Answer to Complaint. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE Entry of Appearance USING Civil Events - Other Filings - Notices - Notice of Appearance. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (km) |
Filing 2 Notice to J. TODD MURPHY re mandatory eFiling. (jem) |
Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 17-18500, filed by NABUCCO LLC. (Attachments: #1 Order Being Appealed, #2 Transmittal, #3 Certificate of Service)(jem) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Notice of Appeal submitted by J. Todd Murphy, Esq. on 9/26/2018 appears to have address information as to J. Todd Murphy, Esq. that does not match the court's records for this case. Please refer to the court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for information and instructions on maintaining your account. (jem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.