ZULLO et al v. CATIC TITLE INS.
| CATIC TITLE INS. |
| SHEILA ZULLO |
| SHEILA M. ZULLO |
| 3:2018cv15110 |
| October 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Michael A Shipp |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Certification of Failure to File Designation of Record (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter)(km) |
| Filing 3 RESPONSE re #2 Exhibit (to Document). (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(LEVANT, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 2 Exhibits to #1 Bankruptcy Appeal (Motion for Leave to Appeal, Order, Certification of Service.) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Transmittal Letter)(km) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 18-16176, filed by SHEILA ZULLO. (Attachments: #1 Order, #2 Corrected Order, #3 Transmittal, #4 Certificate of Service)(jmh) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Bankruptcy Appeal submitted by SHEILA ZULLO on 10/19/2018 appears to have address information as to the Appellee's counsel, William J. Levant that does not match the court's records for this case. Please refer to the court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for information and instructions on maintaining your account. (jmh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
