MAJOR v. NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS E. MAJOR
Defendant: NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Case Number: 3:2018cv15207
Filed: October 23, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Lois H Goodman
Referring Judge: Freda L Wolfson
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL with prejudice. The clerk of the Court is directed to reopen this action and upon entry of this Order, the case and docket shall be marked closed. Signed by Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 2/11/2019. (mps)
February 8, 2019 Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal by NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC. (REESE, CHRISTOPHER)
December 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order Administratively Terminating Action - 60 Day, Pending Consummation of Settlement. Administrative Termination deadline set for 2/25/2019. Signed by Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 12/27/2018. (jmm, )
December 21, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement and Request for 60-day Order Pursuant to Local Rule 41.1(b) by NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC (REESE, CHRISTOPHER)
December 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT ORDER that the time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint is extended up to and including 12/21/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman on 12/7/2018. (mmh)
November 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CONSENT ORDER that the time within which NSL must answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to 12/7/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman on 11/13/2018. (mps)
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 1/15/2019 03:00 PM in Trenton - Courtroom 7E before Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman on 11/6/2018. (mps)
November 1, 2018 Filing 2 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer Attorney ERIC MATTHEW HURWITZ for NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC added. (REESE, CHRISTOPHER)
November 1, 2018 Clerk`s Text Order - The document #2 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 11/19/2018. (mps)
October 23, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC from Superior Court of New Jersey, Ocean County,, case number OCNC-C-208-18. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9116181), filed by NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC.(REESE, CHRISTOPHER)
October 23, 2018 Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (jmh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MAJOR v. NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Represented By: CHRISTOPHER ALBERT REESE
Represented By: ERIC MATTHEW HURWITZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS E. MAJOR
Represented By: RICHARD SAWYER HAINES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?