ANDERSON v. MERCK & CO.,INC. et al
| DALE ANDERSON |
| MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MERCK & CO.,INC. and MCKESSON CORP. |
| 3:2018cv15844 |
| November 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Tonianne J Bongiovanni |
| Peter G Sheridan |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by THOMAS J. JOYCE, III on behalf of All Plaintiffs (JOYCE, THOMAS) |
| Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion filed by DALE ANDERSON re #3 MOTION to Remand MOTION to Expedite Briefing to Reduce Defendants Time to File a Response and Expedite Ruling (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(CORDNER, MARGARET) |
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by MERCK & CO.,INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. re #3 MOTION to Remand MOTION to Expedite Briefing to Reduce Defendants Time to File a Response and Expedite Ruling (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Karen A. Confoy, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Certificate of Service)(CONFOY, KAREN) |
Filing 15
LETTER ORDER granting a 30 day extension of time within which Merck, may answer, move or otherwise reply to the Complaints in each of the actions listed in Exhibit A. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 12/20/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(jjc)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER that Defendant Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.s (Merck) Request to stay these cases is denied. Plaintiff's #3 Motion to Expedite briefing is denied. Defendants Merck and McKesson Corp. shall respond to Plaintiff's Motions to Remand in the "Bellwether" cases by December 26, 2018; Plaintiff shall reply by January 2, 2019. Oral argument will be held by telephone on 1/7/2019 at 11:30 AM. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to initiate the call. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 12/20/2018. (mps)
|
| Filing 13 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Peter G. Sheridan: Motion Hearing held on 12/17/2018 re #3 MOTION to Remand Oral argument by telephone set for 1/7/2019 at 11:30 A.M. MOTION to Expedite Briefing to Reduce Defendants Time to File a Response and Expedite Ruling filed by DALE ANDERSON. (Denied) Order to be filed. (Plaintiff's counsel will initiate the conference call into chambers at (609)989-0508. (Court Reporter/Recorder Frank Gable.) (dh, ) |
| Filing 12 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Peter G. Sheridan: Motion Hearing held on 12/13/2018 re #3 MOTION to Remand MOTION to Expedite Briefing to Reduce Defendants Time to File a Response and Expedite Ruling filed by DALE ANDERSON, Motions Taken Under Advisement: , Telephone Conference held on 12/13/2018. (Court Reporter/Recorder Frank Gable.) (dh, ) |
|
Filing 11
CONSENT ORDER granting admission pro hac vice as to Matthew W.J. Webb, Esq. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni on 12/12/2018. (mmh)
|
| Filing 10 APPLICATION/PETITION for the Pro Hac Vice Admission of Matthew W. J. Webb for by MERCK & CO.,INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Karen A. Confoy, #2 Declaration of Matthew W. J. Webb, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(CONFOY, KAREN) |
| Filing 9 Letter from Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. regarding briefing schedule re #3 MOTION to Remand MOTION to Expedite Briefing to Reduce Defendants Time to File a Response and Expedite Ruling. (HOLLOWS, ALLISON) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by KAREN A. CONFOY on behalf of MERCK & CO.,INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. (CONFOY, KAREN) |
|
Filing 7
LETTER ORDER that the Court will hear argument on the request to stay all proceedings on 12/13/2018 at 10:00 AM. Fox Rothschild will set the logistics for the call. Signed by Judge Peter G. Sheridan on 12/10/2018. (mmh)
|
| Set deadlines as to #3 MOTION to Remand MOTION to Expedite Briefing to Reduce Defendants Time to File a Response and Expedite Ruling. Motion set for 1/7/2019 before Judge Peter G. Sheridan. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mmh) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Remand , MOTION to Expedite Briefing to Reduce Defendants Time to File a Response and Expedite Ruling by DALE ANDERSON. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Notice of Motion)(CORDNER, MARGARET) |
| Filing 6 Letter from Karen A. Confoy re #5 Letter. (Received in the Clerk's Office on 12/10/2018.) (mmh) |
| Filing 5 Letter from Margaret E. Cordner opposing #4 Letter Requesting a Stay of Removed Cases Pending Transfer. (Received in the Clerk's Office on 12/10/2018.) (mmh) |
| Filing 4 Letter from Karen A. Confoy Requesting a Stay of Removed Cases Pending Transfer. (Received in the Clerk's Office on 12/10/2018.) (mmh) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MERCK & CO.,INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.. (HOLLOWS, ALLISON) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by MERCK & CO.,INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. from Superior Court of Middlesex County, NJ, case number MID L 5930 18. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9158786), filed by MERCK & CO.,INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 L. Civ. R. 11.2 Certification, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Certificate of Service)(HOLLOWS, ALLISON) |
| Judge Peter G. Sheridan and Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni added. (kas, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
