JACKSON v. HUNTER et al
| JAMES H. JACKSON |
| H/O MS. DANIELLE HUNTER, MR. STEPHEN JOHNSON and S.I.D. SCHLOSSELFELD |
| 3:2018cv16446 |
| November 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT received. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mmh) |
| REOPENING CASE: The Clerk is in receipt of the re #3 Application to Proceed IFP filed on 12/20/2018 and hereby reopens the case for review by a Judicial Officer. (dpw) |
| Filing 3 Affidavit of Poverty and Account Certification by JAMES H. JACKSON. (mmh) |
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM and ORDER that the Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this case; that plaintiff may have the above entitled case reopened, if, within thirty (30)days of the date of the entry of this Order, plaintiff either pre-pays the $400 filing fee or submits to the Clerk a complete signed in forma pauperis application, including a certified six-month prison account statement and complete affidavit; directing the Clerk to send Plaintiff certain forms. Signed by Judge Brian R. Martinotti on 12/19/2018. (mmh)
|
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
