AZCONA v. GOMEZ et al
| DANIEL AZCONA |
| P.O. JOSE M. GOMEZ, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT and P.O. RIEPENHOFF |
| 3:2018cv16767 |
| December 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Lois H Goodman |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Letter from DANIEL AZCONA in re evidence concerning case. (mps) |
| Filing 6 Letter from DANIEL AZCONA regarding more evidence concerning case. (mps) |
| Filing 5 Letter from DANIEL AZCONA regarding evidence and proof. (mps) |
| Filing 4 Letter from DANIEL AZCONA regarding plea deal. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(mps) |
| Filing 3 Exhibit to #1 Complaint Received by DANIEL AZCONA. (mps) |
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Clerk shall administratively terminate this case; that Plaintiff may have the above entitled case reopened, if, within thirty (30) days of the date of the entry of this order, Plaintiff either pre-pays the $400 filing fee or submits to the Clerk a complete signed in forma pauperis application; that the Clerk mail Plaintiff certain forms. Signed by Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 12/4/2018. (mmh) Modified on 1/3/2019 (eaj, ).
|
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(jmh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
