WILLIAMS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
MARK S. WILLIAMS |
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and TRACY SHIMONIS-KAMINSKI |
3:2019cv00573 |
January 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Michael A Shipp |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Letter from Mark S. Williams, re #2 ORDER (Attachments: #1 Exhibit I, #2 Exhibit J, #3 Envelope)(km) |
Filing 4 Letter request from DAG to be removed from noticing.. (HENDERSON, CAROL) |
Filing 3 Letter to Mrs. Colao from Mark S. Williams. (km) |
Filing 2 ORDER that the Clerk shall serve the Bureau; if the Bureau intends to refer the action to the County Prosecutors Office a referral letter is to be filed within 14 days from the date of the Order to Answer. It is Order that within 45 days of this Order Respondents may file a Motion to Dismiss on timeless grounds only. If the Motion to Dismiss in not filed a full answer to all claims in the Petition shall be filed within 60 days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 2/25/2019. (km) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number TRE099055 (km) |
Filing 1 PETITION for writ of habeas corpus (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D & E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Envelope)(jmh) Modified on 1/17/2019 (jmh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.