BRANCHFLOWER et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
| JOSEPH BRANCHFLOWER and BRIANA BRANCHFLOWER |
| ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON |
| 3:2019cv07938 |
| March 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by DAVID R. KOTT on behalf of ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON (KOTT, DAVID) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON. (CRAWFORD, KELLY) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON from Superior Court of Middlesex County, NJ, case number MID-L-1944-19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9474971), filed by ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(CRAWFORD, KELLY) |
| Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (jmh) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Notice of Removal submitted by Kelly Crawford on 03/06/2019 appears to have address information on Exhibit A, as to Plaintiff's attorney Michael Leh that does not match the court's records for this case. Please refer to the court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for information and instructions on maintaining your account. (jmh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
