KEELING v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. et al
| CARL KEELING |
| SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS and DOE DEFENDANTS 1-10 |
| 3:2019cv08189 |
| March 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Lois H Goodman |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS re #16 First MOTION to Vacate #15 Order of Dismissal, #13 Order on Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kate D. Seib, Esq.)(SEIB, KATHERINE) |
| Set Deadlines as to #16 First MOTION to Vacate #15 Order of Dismissal, #13 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Motion set for 1/21/2020 before Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jem) |
| Filing 16 First MOTION to Vacate #15 Order of Dismissal, #13 Order on Motion to Dismiss by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Attorney affidavit in support, #2 Text of Proposed Order Order)(COLELLA, ALEXANDRA) |
Filing 15
ORDER OF DISMISSAL without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 11/26/2019. (eaj)
|
| Filing 14 Notice of Call for dismissal Pursuant to L.Civ.R. 41.1(a). Motion set for 11/18/2019 before Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jmm, ) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Dismiss Defendant Smith & Nephew. Signed by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 7/12/2019. (km)
|
|
Filing 12
LETTER ORDER that the Court will consider Defendant's Motion to Dismiss as unopposed. Signed by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 6/14/2019. (jem)
|
| ATTETNTION COUNSEL: The Initial Conference scheduled for 6/18/19 with Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman has been cancelled pending decision on #8 Motion to Dismiss. (if, ) |
| Filing 11 Letter from Kate Seib. (SEIB, KATHERINE) |
| Filing 10 Letter from Kate Seib. (Attachments: #1 Stipulation and Proposed Order for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss)(SEIB, KATHERINE) |
|
Filing 9
STIPULATION and Order for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by All Plaintiffs. (CORDNER, MARGARET)
|
| Set Deadlines as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Jury Demand. Motion set for 5/6/2019 before Judge Freda L. Wolfson. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mps) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Jury Demand by SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(KERNER, GLENN) |
|
Filing 7
STIPULATION AND ORDER that Smith & Nephew shall answer, move as to, or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 4/12/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman on 3/25/2019. (mps)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 6/18/2019 02:30 PM in Trenton - Courtroom 7E before Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman on 3/13/2019. (mps)
|
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #5 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 3/29/2019. (mps) |
| Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Plaintiff's Complaint for Damages and Jury Demand.. (KERNER, GLENN) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by CARLA ROSE KARP on behalf of SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. (KARP, CARLA) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Notice of Removal with exhibits; Disclosure Statement of Smith & Nephew, Inc.; Certification Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 10.1(a) and Civil Cover Sheet served on Alexandra Collella on March 8, 2019, filed by SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.. (KERNER, GLENN) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. identifying Smith & Nephew PLC as Corporate Parent.. (KERNER, GLENN) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. from Superior Court of Monmouth County, case number MON L 000414 19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9483148), filed by SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C to the Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certification Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 10.1(a))(KERNER, GLENN) |
| Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (jmh) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: The Nature of Suit for is 367 (Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability) . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
