BENNETT v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
| JAMES D. JOHNSON and THE ESTATE OF VIRGINIA M. JOHNSON |
| JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO. |
| INVOKANA (CANAGLIFLOZIN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION |
| 3:2019cv08807 |
| March 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Lois H Goodman |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jmh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9518497) with JURY DEMAND, filed by DIANNA BENNETT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ABRAMOWITZ, MARK) |
| Member Case Direct File on 03/21/2019, for MDL 2750 Party INVOKANA (CANAGLIFLOZIN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION added. (jmh) |
| Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (jmh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
