NEWHOUSE v. TRANSUNION et al
| Yocheved Newhouse |
| EQUIFAX, TRANSUNION, HYUNDAI MOTOR FINANCE and EXPERIAN |
| 3:2019cv13236 |
| May 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TRANSUNION identifying TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (BROWN, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by WILLIAM ROBERT BROWN on behalf of TRANSUNION (BROWN, WILLIAM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TRANSUNION from Superior Court Of New Jersey, County Of Ocean, case number OCN-DC-005262-19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9708581), filed by TRANSUNION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Summons To Trans Union, LLC, #3 Exhibit B - Complaint To Trans Union, LLC)(BROWN, WILLIAM) |
| Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (jmh) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information is to be entered in CAPITAL LETTERS . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
