HAGER et al v. SELENE FINANCE LP et al
| DONALD HAGER and CARRIE HAGER |
| SELENE FINANCE LP, DOES 1-10 and CITIMORTGAGE, INC. |
| 3:2019cv13650 |
| June 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Deadlines as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 8/19/2019 before Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jdb) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss by SELENE FINANCE LP. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Stephen J. Steinlight, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Brief, #11 Text of Proposed Order)(STEINLIGHT, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by CITIMORTGAGE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Text of Proposed Order, #13 Memorandum of Law, #14 Certificate of Service)(BRENNER, SCOTT) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CITIMORTGAGE, INC. identifying Citibank, N.A. as Corporate Parent.. (BRENNER, SCOTT) |
| Set Deadlines as to #9 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 8/19/2019 before Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jdb) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #7 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by SELENE FINANCE LP has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 07/24/2019. (jmh) |
| Filing 7 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer. (STEINLIGHT, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by STEPHEN STEINLIGHT on behalf of SELENE FINANCE LP (STEINLIGHT, STEPHEN) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #5 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by CITIMORTGAGE, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 7/24/2019. (km) |
| Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Application for An Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint.. (BRENNER, SCOTT) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by SCOTT BRADLEY BRENNER on behalf of CITIMORTGAGE, INC. (BRENNER, SCOTT) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CITIMORTGAGE, INC., DOES 1-10, SELENE FINANCE LP. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jdb) |
| Filing 2 Consent and Registration Form to Receive Documents Electronically filed by CARRIE HAGER. (jdb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CITIMORTGAGE, INC., DOES 1-10, SELENE FINANCE LP ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number NEW039781) with JURY DEMAND, filed by DONALD HAGER, CARRIE HAGER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit)(jdb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
