SCHWARTZ v. BERTUCIO et al
| CHOYCE C. SCHWARTZ |
| HOBBIE, CORRIGANT & BERTUCIO, P.C., ELYSE S. SCHINDEL and EDWARD C. BERTUCIO |
| 3:2019cv15590 |
| July 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Lois H Goodman |
| Michael A Shipp |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Reset Deadlines as to #2 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono. Motion set for 8/19/2019 before Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (abr, ) |
| Set Deadlines as to #2 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono. Motion set for 8/19/2019 before Judge Michael A. Shipp. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (abr, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono by CHOYCE C. SCHWARTZ. (abr, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Envelope)(abr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
