HARRIS v. POWELL et al
| GARY ABDQ HARRIS |
| NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN POWELL, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and MIDDLESEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT |
| 3:2019cv18232 |
| September 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
LETTER ORDER: Petitioner's request for a stay is GRANTED. The Clerk shall administratively terminative this matter. Plaintiff move to reopen the matter by notifying the Court in writing of his intention to do so. Signed by Judge Brian R. Martinotti on 10/29/2019. (jdb) Modified on 11/17/2019 (eaj, ).
|
|
Filing 4
Letter request for 45-day stay and Abeyance from Gary Abdq Harris. (Attachments: #1 Portions of Pre-Sentence Report, #2 Envelope)(jdb)
|
|
Filing 3
Resubmitted Cover Letter to Original Complaint #1 from Gary Abdq Harris. (jdb)
|
|
Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number CAM010725 (jdb)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by GARY ABDQ HARRIS. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #3 Writ of Mandamus, #4 Certification)(jdb)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by GARY ABDQ HARRIS. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(jdb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
