PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. et al v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
Plaintiff: FWK HOLDINGS, L.L.C. and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Defendant: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC
Case Number: 3:2019cv18326
Filed: September 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Lois H Goodman
Referring Judge: Brian R Martinotti
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18:1961
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2019 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.. (NAST, DIANNE)
September 25, 2019 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by FWK HOLDINGS, L.L.C.. (NAST, DIANNE)
September 25, 2019 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (abr)
September 25, 2019 Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (abr)
September 25, 2019 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: In the future when choosing parties please choose each party individually. Do NOT select the ALL PLAINTIFFS or ALL DEFENDANTS button. Party Information is to be entered in CAPITAL LETTERS. The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, )
September 25, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9987747) with JURY DEMAND, filed by Professional Drug Company, Inc., FWK HOLDINGS, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(NAST, DIANNE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. et al v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FWK HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
Represented By: DIANNE M. NAST
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Represented By: DIANNE M. NAST
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NOVO NORDISK INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?