SULLIVAN v. BOROUGH OF ATLANTIC HIGHLANDS et al
| RICHARD G. SULLIVAN and RICHARD SULLIVAN |
| ADAM HUBENY, BOROUGH OF ATLANTIC HIGHLANDS, MARTIN HAWLEY, RICHARD RAST, Tracie Ahern, THOMAS PAINE HOUSE, LLC and PETER JOHNSON |
| 3:2019cv19510 |
| October 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Zahid N Quraishi |
| Michael A Shipp |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
AMENDED COMPLAINT against BOROUGH OF ATLANTIC HIGHLANDS, MARTIN HAWLEY, ADAM HUBENY, RICHARD RAST, PETER JOHNSON, Tracie Ahern, THOMAS PAINE HOUSE, LLC, filed by RICHARD SULLIVAN.(SULLIVAN, MICHAEL)
|
|
Reset Deadlines as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion reset for 1/21/2020 before Judge Michael A. Shipp. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (abr)
|
|
Filing 9
Rule 7.1(d)(5) Letter for an automatic extension of the return date of a dispositive motion filed by RICHARD SULLIVAN re #8 MOTION to Dismiss (SULLIVAN, MICHAEL)
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 1/6/2020 before Judge Michael A. Shipp. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (abr)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss by All Defendants. Responses due by 12/23/2019 (Attachments: #1 Brief Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Certification Certification of Micci J. Weiss, Esq., #3 Exhibit Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit Exhibit F, #9 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Form of Order, #10 Certificate of Service Proof of Service)(WEISS, MICCI)
|
|
Filing 7
Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendants, Borough of Atlantic Highlands, Adam Hubeny, Martin Hawley and Richard Rast.. (WEISS, MICCI)
|
|
Answer Due Deadline Update - The document #7 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by MARTIN HAWLEY, ADAM HUBENY, BOROUGH OF ATLANTIC HIGHLANDS, RICHARD RAST has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 12/6/2019. (abr)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by RICHARD SULLIVAN. (SULLIVAN, MICHAEL)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by RICHARD SULLIVAN. (SULLIVAN, MICHAEL)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by RICHARD SULLIVAN. (SULLIVAN, MICHAEL)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Returned Executed by RICHARD SULLIVAN. (SULLIVAN, MICHAEL)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS ISSUED as to BOROUGH OF ATLANTIC HIGHLANDS, MARTIN HAWLEY, ADAM HUBENY, RICHARD RAST. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (abr)
|
|
Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge Zahid N. Quraishi added. (abr)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against BOROUGH OF ATLANTIC HIGHLANDS, MARTIN HAWLEY, ADAM HUBENY, RICHARD RAST ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-10070469) with JURY DEMAND, filed by RICHARD G. SULLIVAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SULLIVAN, MICHAEL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
