ISOM v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
MARTESS ISOM and Gary Hodges |
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SARGEANT'S ROBERTS, JACK ISABELL, GARY BRITTON, MALIK WHITE, WARDEN ELLIS and KALIEF S. WATSON |
3:2019cv19601 |
October 31, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Lois H Goodman |
Michael A Shipp |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 3 Certified Copy of Transfer Order and docket received, Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:19-cv-09727. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (mg) |
Mailed a copy of #2 Order, to Martess Isom ID No. 1100004339 Mercer County Correction Center 640 S. Broad St. Trenton Trenton, NJ 08650-0068. (aea) |
CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of District of New Jersey. (sac) |
|
NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sac) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gary Britton, Ellis, Jack Isabell, Roberts, The State of New Jersey, Kalief S. Watson, Malik White. Document filed by Martess Isom.(sac) |
Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.