COMBS et al v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
| MICHAEL COMBS and DEBORAH COMBS |
| CHATTEM, INC., SANOFI US SERVICES INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
| 3:2019cv20289 |
| November 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Lois H Goodman |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MICHAEL COMBS, DEBORAH COMBS. CHATTEM, INC. served on 12/2/2019, answer due 12/23/2019. (SEEGER, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MICHAEL COMBS, DEBORAH COMBS. SANOFI US SERVICES INC. served on 11/20/2019, answer due 12/11/2019. (SEEGER, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MICHAEL COMBS, DEBORAH COMBS. SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC served on 11/20/2019, answer due 12/11/2019. (SEEGER, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MICHAEL COMBS, DEBORAH COMBS. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. served on 11/20/2019, answer due 12/11/2019. (SEEGER, CHRISTOPHER) |
Filing 8
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER to Stay All Proceedings Pending JPML Determination. All deadlines, including Defendants' obligation to respond to the Complaint, are VACATED until further order of the Court. Signed by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 12/10/2019. (jem)
|
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC identifying Sanofi as Corporate Parent.. (STERN, MITCHELL) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SANOFI US SERVICES INC. identifying Sanofi as Corporate Parent.. (STERN, MITCHELL) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CHATTEM, INC. identifying Sanofi as Corporate Parent.. (STERN, MITCHELL) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The #3 Proposed Stipulation to Stay All Proceeding filed by Shankar Duraiswamy, Esq. on 12/03/2019 was submitted incorrectly as a Motion. For future reference, when using the event motion, you must file a Notice of Motion along with the other documents required by the rules of this Court. The Clerks office has terminated the calendar event created by this filing and will forward this proposed stipulation to chambers. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (jem) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. identifying Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation as Corporate Parent.. (DURAISWAMY, SHANKAR) |
| Filing 3 Joint MOTION to Stay All Proceedings Pending JPML Determination by BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.. (DURAISWAMY, SHANKAR) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CHATTEM, INC., SANOFI US SERVICES INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (abr) |
| Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (abr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CHATTEM, INC., SANOFI US SERVICES INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-10111902) with JURY DEMAND, filed by MICHAEL COMBS, DEBORAH COMBS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(SEEGER, CHRISTOPHER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
