JONES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
| JONES N. RICCO and RICCO N. JONES |
| MATTHEW MURPHY, MATTHEW KATZENBACH, JOSEPH WALSH, JR. and STATE OF NEW JERSEY |
| 3:2019cv21629 |
| December 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Lois H Goodman |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
LETTER ORDER that the Plaintiff is granted an additional 30 days to comply with the Court's 1/15/2020 Order. If by 3/15/2020 the Court receives Plaintiff's letter with the intent to reopen the case, along with either the $400 civil complaint filing fee or a completed IFP application, the case will be reopened. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman on 1/29/2020. (jem)
|
|
Filing 3
Letter from Ricco N. Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jem)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER that the Clerk of the Court correct Plaintiff's name on the docket to "Ricco N. Jones"; case ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATED; if Plaintiff wishes to reopen this case, he shall notify the Court in writing, with a completed IFP application or filing fee, within 30 days of entry of this order. Signed by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 1/15/2020. (jem)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint Continued, #2 Attachment, #3 Application IFP, #4 Cover Letter, #5 Envelope)(abr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
