KASHINSKY et al v. MURPHY et al
| ROBERT KASHINSKY, NEW JERSEY SECOND AMENDMENT SOCIETY, SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC. and RACING RAILS LLC |
| PHILIP D. MURPHY and PATRICK J. CALLAHAN |
| 3:2020cv03127 |
| March 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Zahid N Quraishi |
| Michael A Shipp |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to PATRICK J. CALLAHAN, PHILIP D. MURPHY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (abr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number BNJDC-10586705), filed by SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., Robert Kashinsky, NEW JERSEY SECOND AMENDMENT SOCIETY, Racing Rails LLC d/b/a Legend Arms. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JENSEN, DAVID) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information, should be entered in ALL CAPS. The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (eaj) |
| Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge Zahid N. Quraishi added. (abr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
