DEPALMA et al v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY et al
MAULIK SANGHAVI, PAUL MACCHIA and NICHOLAS DEPALMA |
DIANE GUTIERREZ-SCACCETTI, RAPHAEL SALERMO, JOHN D MINELLA, RONALD GRAVINO, ULISES E DIAZ, NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, PHILLIP MURPHY, MARY-ELIZABETH GARRITY, JOHN O'HERN, MICHAEL R DUPONT and RAYMOND M POCINO |
3:2020cv03210 |
March 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by THOMAS A. ABBATE on behalf of ULISES E DIAZ, MICHAEL R DUPONT, MARY-ELIZABETH GARRITY, RONALD GRAVINO, DIANE GUTIERREZ-SCACCETTI, JOHN D MINELLA, NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, JOHN O'HERN, RAYMOND M POCINO, RAPHAEL SALERMO (ABBATE, THOMAS) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by DIANE GUTIERREZ-SCACCETTI, ULISES E DIAZ, MARY-ELIZABETH GARRITY, MICHAEL R DUPONT, JOHN D MINELLA, JOHN O'HERN, RONALD GRAVINO, NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, RAPHAEL SALERMO, RAYMOND M POCINO from Monmouth County Superior Court of New Jersey, case number MON-L-000709-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10599026), filed by DIANE GUTIERREZ-SCACCETTI, ULISES E DIAZ, MARY-ELIZABETH GARRITY, MICHAEL R DUPONT, JOHN D MINELLA, JOHN O'HERN, RONALD GRAVINO, NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, RAPHAEL SALERMO, RAYMOND M POCINO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(ABBATE, THOMAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.