QUIROZ et al v. RIDER UNIVERSITY
| SAMUEL QUIROZ and JOSCELYN QUIROZ |
| RIDER UNIVERSITY |
| 3:2020cv05620 |
| May 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by ROBYN R. ENGLISH-MEZZINO on behalf of RIDER UNIVERSITY (ENGLISH-MEZZINO, ROBYN) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by JOSCELYN QUIROZ, SAMUEL QUIROZ. RIDER UNIVERSITY waiver sent on 6/2/2020, answer due 8/3/2020. (FRAIETTA, PHILIP) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL EDWARD BAUGHMAN on behalf of RIDER UNIVERSITY (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(BAUGHMAN, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by ANGELO A. STIO, III on behalf of RIDER UNIVERSITY (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(STIO, ANGELO) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to RIDER UNIVERSITY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mg) |
| Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (mg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RIDER UNIVERSITY ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-10780134) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JOSCELYN QUIROZ, SAMUEL QUIROZ. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(FRAIETTA, PHILIP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
