LY v. iCIMS, INC. et al
MOHAMED LY |
iCIMS, INC. and MAHADEVAN SUBRAMANI |
3:2020cv09593 |
July 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Tonianne J Bongiovanni |
Freda L Wolfson |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 10/27/2020 02:30 PM in Trenton - Courtroom 6E before Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni on 09/25/2020. (jdb) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by iCIMS, INC.. (PINKSTONE, WAYNE) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by MAHADEVAN SUBRAMANI, iCIMS, INC..(PINKSTONE, WAYNE) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by MOHAMED LY. MAHADEVAN SUBRAMANI waiver sent on 7/31/2020, answer due 9/29/2020; iCIMS, INC. waiver sent on 7/31/2020, answer due 9/29/2020. (RAHMAN, TANVIR) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MAHADEVAN SUBRAMANI, iCIMS, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (abr ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MAHADEVAN SUBRAMANI, iCIMS, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11135966) with JURY DEMAND, filed by MOHAMED LY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(RAHMAN, TANVIR) |
Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni added. (abr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.