RENARD et al v. CAPITAL HEALTH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al
CHARLENE RENARD and KYLA BELTON |
CAPITAL HEALTH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and CAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. |
3:2020cv10354 |
August 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Lois H Goodman |
Freda L Wolfson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by CHARLENE RENARD, KYLA BELTON. CAPITAL HEALTH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER waiver sent on 9/9/2020, answer due 11/9/2020; CAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. waiver sent on 9/9/2020, answer due 11/9/2020. (KARPF, ARI) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by CHRISTINE ELAINE BURKE on behalf of KYLA BELTON, CHARLENE RENARD (BURKE, CHRISTINE) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CAPITAL HEALTH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, CAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CAPITAL HEALTH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, CAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11197800) with JURY DEMAND, filed by CHARLENE RENARD, KYLA BELTON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(KARPF, ARI) |
Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.