STEIN v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
FAIGY STEIN |
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC |
3:2020cv13275 |
September 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Zahid N Quraishi |
Freda L Wolfson |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Order Administratively Terminating Action - 60 Day, Pending Consummation of Settlement. Administrative Termination deadline set for 1/22/2021. Signed by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 11/23/2020. (jmm, ) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement with Equifax Information Services, LLC by FAIGY STEIN (BOROOSAN, MOSHE) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by FAIGY STEIN. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC served on 10/1/2020, answer due 10/22/2020. (BOROOSAN, MOSHE) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by MOSHE O BOROOSAN on behalf of FAIGY STEIN (BOROOSAN, MOSHE) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting Defendant's #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Equifax to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to 11/23/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zahid N. Quraishi on 10/20/2020. (jmh) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC identifying Equifax Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (BELL, ALNISA) |
Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint or Otherwise Plead by EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(BELL, ALNISA) |
Set Deadlines as to #3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint or Otherwise Plead. Motion set for 11/16/2020 before Magistrate Judge Zahid N. Quraishi. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jdb) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (abr ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number ANJDC-11408323) with JURY DEMAND, filed by FAIGY STEIN. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KROUB, EDWARD) |
Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Zahid N. Quraishi added. (abr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: STEIN v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC | |
Represented By: | ALNISA S. BELL |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: FAIGY STEIN | |
Represented By: | EDWARD Y. KROUB |
Represented By: | MOSHE O BOROOSAN |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.