BODEN et al v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION et al
Plaintiff: KELLY GRADY and KENNETH BODEN
Defendant: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, JANE/JOHN DOE, ABC CORPORATION 1-25 and JOHN/JANE ROES 1-25
Case Number: 3:2020cv20110
Filed: December 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Douglas E Arpert
Referring Judge: Michael A Shipp
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2021 Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Support filed by BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION re #4 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(MEKLES, ERICA)
February 3, 2021 Filing 11 Cross MOTION to Remand to Monmouth County Superior Court by KENNETH BODEN, KELLY GRADY. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Attorney, #2 Brief, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Text of Proposed Order)(GALPERN, MICHAEL)
February 3, 2021 Filing 10 Cross MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by KENNETH BODEN, KELLY GRADY. (Attachments: #1 Certification Certification of Attorney, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Text of Proposed Order proposed form of Order)(GALPERN, MICHAEL)
February 3, 2021 Set Deadlines as to #10 Cross MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint, #11 Cross MOTION to Remand to Monmouth County Superior Court. Motion set for 2/16/2021 before Judge Michael A. Shipp. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mg)
February 3, 2021 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Cross Motion #9 filed by Geoffrey Smith on 2/1/2021 was submitted incorrectly as a Response. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE Cross Motion USING Motion. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (mg)
February 1, 2021 Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition filed by KENNETH BODEN, KELLY GRADY re #4 MOTION to Dismiss with Plaintiffs' Cross Motion to Amend Complaint and Plaintiffs' Cross Motion to Remand to State Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Index Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(SMITH, GEOFFREY)
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 TEXT ORDER: Granting #7 letter request by plaintiff with consent. ORDER adjourning #4 MOTION to Dismiss to 2/16/2021. Opposition due 2/2/21, defendant's reply due 2/9/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 1/14/2021. (eh, )
January 13, 2021 Filing 7 Letter from Attorney Michael A. Galpern on behalf of Plaintiffs requesting adj with consent of def motion to dismiss to 2-16-2021 re #4 MOTION to Dismiss . (GALPERN, MICHAEL)
January 4, 2021 Filing 6 Rule 7.1(d)(5) Letter for an automatic extension of the return date of a dispositive motion filed by KENNETH BODEN re #4 MOTION to Dismiss (SMITH, GEOFFREY)
January 4, 2021 Filing 5 Rule 7.1(d)(5) Letter for an automatic extension of the return date of a dispositive motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss . (SMITH, GEOFFREY)
January 4, 2021 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Letter Rule 7.1 filings #5 and #6 submitted by Geoffrey Smith on 1/4/2021 appear to be duplicates. These submissions will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. This message is for informational purposes only. (mg)
January 4, 2021 Reset Deadlines as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 2/1/2021 before Judge Michael A. Shipp. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mg)
December 23, 2020 Set Deadlines as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion set for 1/19/2021 before Judge Michael A. Shipp. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mg)
December 22, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION. Responses due by 1/5/2021 (Attachments: #1 Brief in support of Motion, #2 Certification of Erica S. Mekles, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(MEKLES, ERICA)
December 22, 2020 Filing 3 Exhibit to #1 Notice of Removal, Civil Cover Sheet by BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION. (MEKLES, ERICA)
December 22, 2020 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION. (MEKLES, ERICA)
December 22, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION from Superior Court New Jersey Monmouth County, case number MON-L-3326-20. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-11861796), filed by BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Certification)(MEKLES, ERICA)
December 22, 2020 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Plaintiff was not added to the docket. When entering parties make sure to add ALL plaintiffs and defendants as found on the original state court complaint . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, )
December 22, 2020 Judge Michael A. Shipp and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (mg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BODEN et al v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Represented By: ERICA SINGER MEKLES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JANE/JOHN DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ABC CORPORATION 1-25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN/JANE ROES 1-25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KELLY GRADY
Represented By: MICHAEL A. GALPERN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KENNETH BODEN
Represented By: MICHAEL A. GALPERN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?