GOEN v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
Plaintiff: MICHAEL GOEN
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO. and JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC
Case Number: 3:2021cv00048
Filed: January 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Lois H Goodman
Referring Judge: Brian R Martinotti
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2021 Filing 7 Certified Copy of Transfer Order and docket received, Case transferred in from District of Nebraska; Case Number 7:20-cv-05008. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
January 4, 2021 Filing 6 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER. Case is transferred to USDC-New Jersey, Docket No. 2750. (LKO)
January 4, 2021 Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (mg)
December 30, 2020 Filing 5 COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from the Multidistrict Litigation Panel. Clerk to wait for certified copy of order to transfer the file to USDC-New Jersey, Docket No. 2750. (LKO)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REASSIGNMENT ORDER - that due to clerical error, this case is reassigned to Chief District Judge John M. Gerrard for disposition and remains assigned to Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart for judicial supervision. Ordered by Chief Judge John M. Gerrard. (LKO)
December 18, 2020 Filing 3 LETTER by Clerk regarding Complaint #1 with copy of docket sheet e-mailed to Multidistrict Litigation Panel Office. (ADB)
December 18, 2020 Filing 2 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (ADB)
December 18, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing Fee $402, receipt number ANEDC-4301880), by Attorney James R. Korth on behalf of Michael Goen (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Korth, James) Modified on 12/18/2020 to reflect filing fee paid(ADB).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GOEN v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL GOEN
Represented By: James R. Korth
Represented By: Robert B. Reynolds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?