WANG v. TWENTY-TWO FRANKLIN STREET GROUP, LLC et al
| JOSEPHINE WANG |
| TWENTY-TWO FRANKLIN STREET GROUP, LLC and THOMAS E CETNAR, III |
| 3:2021cv02017 |
| February 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Lois H Goodman |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jal, ) Modified on 2/17/2021 (jal, ). |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to THOMAS E CETNAR, III, TWENTY-TWO FRANKLIN STREET GROUP, LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jal, ) |
| Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (jal, ) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: In the future when choosing parties please choose each party individually. Do NOT select the ALL PLAINTIFFS or ALL DEFENDANTS button . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (jjc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number BNJDC-12091799) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JOSEPHINE WANG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(HELFER, ARLEIGH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
