GREENMAN v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
YEHUDA GREENMAN |
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. |
3:2021cv02485 |
February 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Lois H Goodman |
Freda L Wolfson |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, MOTION to Stay Action by AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Brief /Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant American Express National Bank's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action, #2 Declaration of Keith Herr in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration, #3 Exhibit A - Cardmember Agreement, #4 Exhibit B - Monthly Statement, #5 Text of Proposed Order, #6 Certificate of Service)(LEE, MARK) |
Set Deadlines as to #15 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Action. Motion set for 5/3/2021 before Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jdb, ) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY.(LEE, MARK) |
Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY identifying American Express Company as Corporate Parent.. (LEE, MARK) |
![]() |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with separate defenses by EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC..(KOWAL, DOROTHY) |
Filing 10 Notice to be terminated and withdraw from Notices of Electronic filing as to case. Attorney NAKICHA T JOSEPH terminated. (JOSEPH, NAKICHA) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by YAAKOV SAKS on behalf of YEHUDA GREENMAN (SAKS, YAAKOV) |
![]() |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by MARK D. LEE on behalf of AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(LEE, MARK) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by YEHUDA GREENMAN. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY served on 2/16/2021, answer due 3/9/2021. (JOSEPH, NAKICHA) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by YEHUDA GREENMAN. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. served on 2/16/2021, answer due 3/9/2021. (JOSEPH, NAKICHA) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. identifying Experian plc as Corporate Parent.. (KOWAL, DOROTHY) |
Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Attorney DOROTHY A. KOWAL for EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. added. (KOWAL, DOROTHY) |
Clerk`s Text Order - The document #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 03/23/2021. (jdb, ) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jjc, ) |
Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (jjc, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12122330) with JURY DEMAND, filed by YEHUDA GREENMAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JOSEPH, NAKICHA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.