MACAS-DOMINGUEZ et al v. BONEFISH GRILL, LLC et al
| JASON BOULEY and MARTHA MACAS-DOMINGUEZ |
| JOHN DOES I-X, ABC CORP. I-X, BONEFISH GRILL, LLC and FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST |
| 3:2021cv10195 |
| April 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Lois H Goodman |
| Brian R Martinotti |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Order Initial Conference set for 7/6/2021 10:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman via Telephone Conference. The Court will provide counsel with dial in information prior to the scheduled conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman on 4/27/2021. (ijf, )
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by BONEFISH GRILL, LLC.(SISSELMAN, MARTIN) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BONEFISH GRILL, LLC. (SISSELMAN, MARTIN) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by BONEFISH GRILL, LLC from Superior Court of Mercer County, case number MER L 509 21. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12409526), filed by BONEFISH GRILL, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B Amended Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(SISSELMAN, MARTIN) |
| Judge Brian R. Martinotti and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
