DAUM v. CAPITAL ONE
| BRACHA DAUM |
| CAPITAL ONE |
| 3:2021cv11638 |
| May 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Tonianne J Bongiovanni |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement with Capital One by BRACHA DAUM (KROUB, EDWARD) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (jem) |
Filing 8
CONSENT ORDER that Capital One shall have until 7/23/2021 to answer, move, or otherwise reply to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni on 7/09/2021. (jem)
|
| Filing 7 Proposed Order Consent Order Extending Deadline to Respond to Complaint by CAPITAL ONE. (REESE, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by CHRISTOPHER ALBERT REESE on behalf of CAPITAL ONE (REESE, CHRISTOPHER) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The Application for Clerk's Order for an Extension of Time to Answer document #5 filed by Edward Kroub as to CAPITAL ONE has been DENIED. This request is beyond the scope of what the Clerk can grant and has been forwarded to chambers. (jem) |
| Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer. (KROUB, EDWARD) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The #4 Letter requesting 14-day extension of time to answer Complaint filed by Edward Y. Kroub on 6/17/2021 was submitted incorrectly as a Motion. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE document USING Civil Events - Other Filings - Other Documents - Application for Clerk Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order. The Clerks office has terminated the calendar event created by this filing. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (jem) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by BRACHA DAUM. (KROUB, EDWARD) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BRACHA DAUM. CAPITAL ONE served on 6/3/2021, answer due 6/24/2021. (KROUB, EDWARD) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CAPITAL ONE. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mg, ) |
| Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni added. (mg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CAPITAL ONE ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12486043) with JURY DEMAND, filed by BRACHA DAUM. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KROUB, EDWARD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DAUM v. CAPITAL ONE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CAPITAL ONE | |
| Represented By: | CHRISTOPHER ALBERT REESE |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BRACHA DAUM | |
| Represented By: | EDWARD Y. KROUB |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
