LI v. RENAUD
WEIDONG LI |
ACTING DIRECTOR TRACY RENAUD and TRACY RENAUD |
3:2021cv11642 |
May 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Tonianne J Bongiovanni |
Freda L Wolfson |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer. (HAJDARPASIC, ENES) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by ENES HAJDARPASIC on behalf of TRACY RENAUD (HAJDARPASIC, ENES) |
Clerk`s Text Order - The document #6 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by TRACY RENAUD has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 8/9/2021. (abr, ) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by WEIDONG LI. TRACY RENAUD served on 5/26/2021, answer due 7/26/2021. (ZHU, WAYNE) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to TRACY RENAUD. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mg) |
Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni added. (mg) |
Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT against TRACY RENAUD, filed by WEIDONG LI.(ZHU, WAYNE) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TRACY RENAUD ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12486170), filed by WEIDONG LI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit)(ZHU, WAYNE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.