LEVY v. AT&T SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff: GEORGE LEVY
Defendant: AT&T SERVICES, INC.
Case Number: 3:2021cv11758
Filed: May 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Lois H Goodman
Referring Judge: Zahid N Quraishi
2 Judge: Freda L Wolfson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STATUS REPORT by AT&T SERVICES, INC.. (RICHARDS, DANIEL)
February 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 TEXT ORDER: On 3/22/2022, the Court administratively terminated this matter until the conclusion of the arbitration proceeding. The parties are directed to update the Court on case status by 3/3/2023. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman on 2/23/2023. (ijf, )
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting Defendants' #6 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings; during the pendency of the arbitration proceedings, this matter shall be administratively terminated. Signed by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 3/22/2022. (jem)
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 OPINION filed. Signed by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 3/22/2022. (jem)
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Civil Case Administratively Terminated. (jem)
September 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion filed by AT&T SERVICES, INC. re #6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings (RICHARDS, DANIEL)
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition filed by GEORGE LEVY re #6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Exhibit A)(ORLOW, DANIEL)
August 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Reset Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings. Motion set for 9/20/2021 before Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mg)
August 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Rule 7.1(d)(5) Letter for an automatic extension of the return date of a dispositive motion re #6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings . (ORLOW, DANIEL)
August 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CONSENT ORDER granting pro hac vice admission as to Kenneth W. Gage and Sara B. Tomezsko. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman on 8/06/2021. (jem)
August 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings by AT&T SERVICES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings, #2 Declaration of Brandy Giordano, #3 Declaration of Margaret Rooney-McMillen, #4 Declaration of Michael Albert, #5 Declaration of Kenneth W. Gage)(RICHARDS, DANIEL)
August 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AT&T SERVICES, INC. identifying AT&T Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (RICHARDS, DANIEL)
August 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Letter from Daniel S. Richards to Hon. Lois H. Goodman, U.S.M.J. re: pro hav vice admissions. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order [Proposed Consent Order for Kenneth W. Gage and Sara B. Tomezsko to Appear and Participate Pro Hac Vice], #2 Certification of Kenneth W. Gage, #3 Certification of Sara B. Tomezsko)(RICHARDS, DANIEL)
August 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Set Deadlines as to #6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings. Motion set for 9/7/2021 before Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jem)
June 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. Magistrate Judge Z. N. Quraishi no longer assigned to case. (mg)
June 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by GEORGE LEVY. AT&T SERVICES, INC. waiver sent on 6/7/2021, answer due 8/6/2021. (ORLOW, DANIEL)
May 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to AT&T SERVICES, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mg)
May 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AT&T SERVICES, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12495980) with JURY DEMAND, filed by GEORGE LEVY.(ORLOW, DANIEL)
May 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Zahid N. Quraishi added. (mg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LEVY v. AT&T SERVICES, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GEORGE LEVY
Represented By: DANIEL S. ORLOW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T SERVICES, INC.
Represented By: DANIEL RICHARDS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?