DAVIS v. MAZZA RECYCLING SERVICES LTD. et al
| KALEEA DAVIS |
| MAZZA RECYCLING SERVICES LTD. doing business as MAZZA RECYCLING and MAZZA RECYCLING CORPORATION doing business as MAZZA RECYCLING |
| 3:2021cv12935 |
| June 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 STATEMENT Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by KALEEA DAVIS. (KORSEN, DAVID) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by KALEEA DAVIS. MAZZA RECYCLING SERVICES LTD. waiver sent on 6/24/2021, answer due 8/23/2021. (KARPF, ARI) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by DAVID NATHANIEL KORSEN on behalf of KALEEA DAVIS (KORSEN, DAVID) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MAZZA RECYCLING CORPORATION, MAZZA RECYCLING SERVICES LTD.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jal, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MAZZA RECYCLING CORPORATION, MAZZA RECYCLING SERVICES LTD. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12574143) with JURY DEMAND, filed by KALEEA DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(KARPF, ARI) |
| Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (jal, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
