JOHNSON et al v. ETHICON, INC. et al
| Jody Johnson and Michael Johnson |
| ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON |
| 3:2021cv13404 |
| July 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
STIPULATION and proposed consent order extending time for Defendants to respond to Complaint and First Amended Complaint by All Defendants. (CRAWFORD, KELLY)
|
|
Filing 4
AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, filed by JODY JOHNSON, MICHAEL JOHNSON.(LEATHERS, DANIEL)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by KELLY S. CRAWFORD on behalf of All Defendants (CRAWFORD, KELLY)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS ISSUED as to ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mg, )
|
|
Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (mg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against ETHICON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12611792) with JURY DEMAND, filed by Jody Johnson, Michael Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(LEATHERS, DANIEL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
