GELSOMINE v. REMEX, INC.
| SHAUN GELSOMINE |
| REMEX, INC. |
| 3:2021cv13755 |
| July 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND by REMEX, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Statement Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement, #3 Certificate of Service)(BAILEY, ROBERT) |
| Filing 10 Substitution of Attorney - Attorney PETER CIPPARULO, III terminated. Attorney ROBERT D. BAILEY for REMEX, INC. added.. (BAILEY, ROBERT) |
Filing 9
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time for the Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint until 09/07/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert on 08/16/2021. (jdb)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION FOR TIME TO ANSWER by REMEX, INC.. (CIPPARULO, PETER) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by REMEX, INC.. (CIPPARULO, PETER) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The #7 Stipulation filed by Peter Cipparulo on 08/12/2021 was submitted incorrectly as a Motion. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE Stipulation USING Civil Events - Other Filings - Other Documents - Stipulation. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (jdb) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by PETER CIPPARULO, III on behalf of REMEX, INC. (CIPPARULO, PETER) |
| Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Remex, Inc... (CIPPARULO, PETER) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The #5 Application for Clerk's Order to Extend Time to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond submitted by REMEX, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 08/23/2021. (jdb) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SHAUN GELSOMINE. REMEX, INC. served on 7/19/2021, answer due 8/9/2021. (JONES, JOSEPH) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to REMEX, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jal, ) |
| Filing 2 Request for Summons to be Issued by SHAUN GELSOMINE as to REMEX, INC.. (JONES, JOSEPH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against REMEX, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12638244) with JURY DEMAND, filed by SHAUN GELSOMINE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(JONES, JOSEPH) |
| Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Arpert added. (jal, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GELSOMINE v. REMEX, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SHAUN GELSOMINE | |
| Represented By: | JOSEPH K. JONES |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: REMEX, INC. | |
| Represented By: | PETER CIPPARULO, III |
| Represented By: | ROBERT D. BAILEY |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
