RUSHING v. US DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT KALLOMAZOO
| SHAUN RUSHING |
| US DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT KALLOMAZOO |
| 3:2021cv14556 |
| August 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Douglas E Arpert |
| Freda L Wolfson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 USCA Case Number 21-2761 for #7 Notice of Appeal (USCA), filed by SHAUN RUSHING. USCA Case Manager James (Document Restricted - Court Only) (ca3jk, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #6 Order by SHAUN RUSHING. IFP status. The Clerk's Office hereby certifies the record and the docket sheet available through ECF to be the certified list in lieu of the record and/or the certified copy of the docket entries. (jem) |
| Case transferred from New Jersey has been opened in Western District of Michigan as case 1:21-cv-00743, filed 08/27/2021. (km) |
Filing 6
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, as this case was improperly venued in this District. Signed by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 8/25/2021. (jmh)
|
| #6 Order Transferring Case sent to Plaintiff via USPS on 8/25/2021. (jmh) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (jmh) |
| Case extracted via ECF to USDC, Western District of Michigan. (mem, ) |
| Filing 5 Response to the Court's #4 Order regarding venue filed by Shaun Rushing. (jmh) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #1 -2 application to proceed without prepayments of fees and costs. Plaintiff is directed to show cause, in writing within 30 days of the date of this Order, why venue is proper in this district, and why this case case should not be dismissed and/or transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan. Signed by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 8/9/2021. (jmh)
|
| COMPLAINT against US DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT KALLOMAZOO (, filed by SHAUN RUSHING. Please see D.E. #1 for Complaint.(eaj, ) |
|
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson for all further proceedings. Judge Peter G. Sheridan no longer assigned to case. So Ordered by Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson on 8/3/2021. (km)
|
| Filing 2 Notice of Guidelines for Appearing Pro Se (jal, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application IFP, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Envelope)(jal, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RUSHING v. US DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT KALLOMAZOO | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SHAUN RUSHING | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: US DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT KALLOMAZOO | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
