ORIHUELA et al v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC et al
| JORGE I ORIHUELA and ERIC PFEFFER |
| GENERAL MOTORS LLC, GENERAL MOTORS HOLDINGS LLC, GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY and APTIV SERVICES US, LLC |
| 3:2021cv16336 |
| August 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Lois H Goodman |
| Zahid N Quraishi |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Zahid N. Quraishi on 9/9/2021. (jmh)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by JORGE I ORIHUELA, ERIC PFEFFER (MAGAGNA, DAVID) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to APTIV SERVICES US, LLC, GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS HOLDINGS LLC, GENERAL MOTORS LLC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mg, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (mg) |
| Judge Zahid N. Quraishi and Magistrate Judge Lois H. Goodman added. (mg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against APTIV SERVICES US, LLC, GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS HOLDINGS LLC, GENERAL MOTORS LLC ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12763868) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JORGE I ORIHUELA, ERIC PFEFFER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAGAGNA, DAVID) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
